Monday, June 23, 2008

land mafia in india

e - Voice Of Human Rights Watch - e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom



Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....vol.4.issue.25......21/06/2008



Support Amnesty International



Editorial : land scam in Karnataka – an appeal to honourable supreme court of India & H.E.Honourable Governor Of

Karnataka



When a crime is noticed , it is the duty of the government to investigate who did it ? and to legally prosecute them in court &

provide justice . if thousands of criminals , lakhs of criminals got together & did the same type of crimes , all of them must

be legally prosecuted. Just for the overwhelming numbers of criminals law of the land cann't be changed. However in the

Karnataka state , many political bigwigs , rich crooks have done the same crime , LAND GRABBING – illegal possession of

government land & illegal constructions over it. Important land records of those government lands , lands belonging to poor

are lost in record rooms of civic bodies ( cunningly destroyed by corrupt officials ) Now, their political masters are legalizing

the crimes . what a shame to the government of Karnataka ?



The shri.A.T. RAMA SWAMY , (M.L.A) standing committee in the legislative assembly is still probing the land grabbings in

Karnataka. However the government in a hurry , is auctioning – off those government lands without proper publicity to the

auction process , sufficient time for bidder's expression of interest. In some cases , a pittance is levied as penalty for the

illegal occupation to get it legalized. The government is not bothered about legally prosecuting the illegal occupier of those

lands. In many civic bodies , important property documents belonging to the government & poor are missing from the record

rooms. All these point towards the government intention , to legalise the crimes of illegal land occupiers who are nothing but

their own political cronies.



The recent ordinance by government of Karnataka to regularize land deals is envisaging to legalize the crimes of rich. The

illegal land conversions , land encroachments , encroachment of civic amenities made by the rich are being legalized with

levying a pittance as penalty in the name of public welfare . Whereas the land worth at today's market prices are 10's of

thousands of crore it is only wefare of the rich & mighty . IT IS GOING TO BE MOTHER OF ALL SCAMS. The authorities

evict poor tribal people from their ancestral forest area in the name of conservation , evict tribal people from villages in the

name of development without proper rehabilitation measures. The government is not giving land rights to slum dwellers , poor

, dalits over the land they are dwelling , the government is deaf to appeals of dalits for land rights. However the same

government is sympathetic to rich who have encroached land & built huge commercial complexes worth crores violating all

norms with total disregard to civic amenity or safety.



Hereby , HRW appeals to honourable supreme court of India , to annul the bid process of government of Karnataka with

respect to illegally occupied government lands & to annul this ordinance of government of Karnataka which seeks to legalize

land crimes. Jai hind . vande mataram.

Your's sincerely,

Nagaraj.M.R.



THE CLOUT OF LAND MAFIA IN INDIA -the governments daring to by-pass judiciary

An appeal ( PIL ) to the honourable supreme court of India



The recent attempts by government of India & other state governments to legalise land grabbings by enacting new land laws

in the name of public welfare is farce . while crores of people are without shelter & are living on streets , people in slums ,

tribal lands are struggling for land rights since decades the governments were mum & deaf. Now , as the rulers themselves &

their cronies have built illegal constructions running into crores they are shedding crocodile tears in the name of public

welfare. In india, various state governments have enacted " town municipal / city corporation laws & building laws" , to ensure

orderly growth of cities & towns , to ensure the safety of buildings & it's occupants , to ensure the safety of pedestrians &

road users.



Numerous educated people , ruling elite – ministers , police , government officials , M.Ps , M.L.As , etc knowing fully well

about the laws have illegally built bungalows , commercial complexes , throwing to wind all laws. In their greed they have

shown utter contempt towards law. They have encroached dried –up lakes , rivulets , rain flow paths , drainages , foot paths ,

civic amenity sites. In their building there are violations of- lack of fire safety exits , lack of parking space , encroachment of

foot paths , conservancy line , drainages , etc.



There is wide spread corruption in the corporation / municipal authorities. For a price officials have converted CA sites to

commercial purposes , authorised deviations / encroachments of public

lands like foot paths , drainages , parking space , set-off , etc. The corporation officials themselves are violating city master

plans. Even before authorising the conversions & encroachments of lands , the

corporation officials are not making alternate arrangements. By all these corrupt deeds many of the corporation officilas have

become millionaires . however more & more road accidents are taking place , building collapses & fire tragedies are occurring

, during heavy rainfalls water is getting clogged – ALL THESE RESULTING IN LOSS OF HUMAN LIVE & PROPERTIES. In

recent days numerous murders have taken place over the real estate issues . THE CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS MADE

DEATH THREATS & FORCED THE PIL APPLICANT IN THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ABOUT LAND GRABBINGS IN

KORAMANGALA LAYOUT BANGALORE. The government of karnataka instead of protecting the PIL applicant & upholding

the law has taken sides with the land grabbers.





The state governments of karnataka & delhi has got M.L.As & officials who have themselves violated building laws & grabbed

govt lands. Now , the two govts are contemplating to bring in laws regularising these land grabbing crimes for a pittance as

penalty. All to by-pass judiciary. The governments are least bothered about the lives of poor & only too caring towards the

land grabbing criminals. The same governments have not yet given land rights to poor slum dwellers / dalits , land rights to

tribals living in forest since centuries , land rights to poor agricultural labourers, where as it is full of concern towards rich &

mighty land grabbers – criminals. Bottom line – whatever be the magnitude of crime if you are rich & mighty law will be bended

to suit you , by bad luck if you are a poor folk you are bound to suffer being on the right side of law also. Hereby , HUMAN

RIGHTS WATCH urges requests the honourable supreme court of india , to register this as a PIL , to provide protection to

the PIL applicant in bangalore & to take appropriate actions against the GOK & GOD nipping at bud their illegal motives to

regularise land grabbings.



ILLEGALITIES IN AUCTION OF M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD MYSORE


During the auction of above sick industry the land usage was for industrial purpose only. so, people with other commercial

objectives were not allowed to participate in the auction. Thereby, the final auctioned amount was very much less than the

market value. This has a direct bearing on employees of that industry , lending banks , govt dept , etc who have all put

forward their claims for dues from that industry. noW, all of them are getting very much less than what is due from the closed

company. A loss of crores of rupees to banks , government , employees has been made by the cunningness of civic bodies.

Now in a backdoor move the M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , M.C.C are moving to give land usage conversion to the new occupier, who

is building posh villas & resorts here. Is it right & justified ? should not they conduct auction once again or charge market

value to the new owner.



LAND MAFIA IN KARNATAKA


The land mafia which has links with political leadership & top govt servants in the state, is running business widely in &

around bangalore,mysore & other major towns. The authorities like city corporation , B.D.A, M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , etc are

denotifying the lands meant for public welfare in favour of land mafia. The authorities have earmarked these lands for public

welfare ie parks , schools , hospitals at the planning stage itself for current & future needs of the people. In most cases the

land mafia has illegally occupied the lands , built commercial complexes & sold it for crores of rupees.



1. the authorities are not demolishing these illegal structures & prosecuting the occupiers.



2. In some cases the authorities are denotifying , regularizing those illegal occupations by levying a pittance as penalty which

is very much less than the market value.



3. In some cases for example a notified site for school is alloted to an educational trust. They build 2 rooms in 25% of the site

& state that this is free school meant for weaker sections. After a year or two , they state before the authority that to run this

school they need funds. So they are planning to build commercial complexes around the school site & by the rent collected

from shops they will run the school. In this manner sites meant for schools , hospitals , temples & other social organisations

apply for conversion of land usage & use major portion of the land for commercial purposes.



Hereby , HRW urges the govt of karnataka & other authorities ,



1. to clearly demarcate the govt lands & announce it boldly to the public.



2. To clearly demarcate lands meant for public amenities both for current & future usage.



3. To clearly demarcate lands required for town planning say 20 years down the line.



4. To clearly mention in such plans the purpose it is reserved for ie parks , hospitals , schools , etc.



5. To impartially act against illegal occupiers – rich or poor.



6. Say while denotifying a land meant for school an alternate land for school must be incorporated in the original plan.



7. Before denotification public objections must be called for & considered responsibly.



8. After denotification the land must be sold at the market rate not the govt rate.



9. In case of land usage conversion also the objections from the public must be called for & considered responsibly.



10. After land usage conversion an alternate land must be incorporated in the plan for the original use.



11. In case of land usage conversion also the occupier must be charged at the market value.



12. To declare annually the property details of all officials with denotifying / land usage conversion authorities together with

details of their family member's properties with provision for public scrutiny, cross checking.



13. To ruthlessly prosecute the corrupt officials & ministers.



14. To make public the report of past district magistrate mysore mr. T.M. VIJAYA BHASKAR about illegal land dealings in &

around mysore. Also the action taken report.



ILLEGALITIES IN BANGALORE-MYSORE EXPRESSWAY PROJECT


Different political parties are trading charges against each other about illegalities in the mysore-bangalore expressway

project. Grave mistakes have been committed by the previous state governments. The saving grace is judiciary has taken

note of it. The fundamental principle behind land acquisitions by the governments is to use that acquired lands for public

welfare. As the govt acquires the land with this noble intentions even the land looser contents himself with compensation at

govt rate. Always the govt rate is much below market value. If at all the govt wants to give out that acquired land to a private

party for private use or for the use of a selected few, the govt must give prevailing market rate to the land looser. In such

cases the govt does not have authority to force the land owner to sell his property.



In this mysore-bangalore 4 lane expressway project, following inconsistencies are there,



1. this road is not for free public use, but only for those who pays the toll fees.



2. The luxurious resorts , townships , etc which are to be built alongside this road are not open for free public usage but only

for the rich who can afford it.



3. The govt has concluded this deal in a hush-hush manner.



4. Any disputes raised by this project should be addressed to international arbiter at london which a poor land owner or

general public can ill-afford.



5. The govt has not paid the prevailing market value to the land loosers.



6. The govt has not given the option to land owners not to sell their property.



7. This whole project is for rich , built by the rich for the rich & not meant for public welfare.



The govt must give back the lands to the owners who wants it back & must pay the market value to those willing to sell. As

this project is built by wealthy people for wealthy people why cann't they cough- up market value?



CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A)
AGAINST A POOR WOWAN


The B.D.A flouts it's own rules & spreads red carpet for big land developers & land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money

spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements & rowdies. They illegally

evict genuine allottees who are poor & without any connections from allotted prime lands & sell-off those prime land to the

highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas & in some cases left in the lurch.



Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house

no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.

310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.



The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah

complied with all the rules & in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A'S account. However when

he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He

complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn't take steps to evict the illegal

encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf

ears. Hurt by this gross injustice & mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.



Subsequently, the poor man's daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once

again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father's allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different

game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house & told her that they will

regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans & repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before

she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor

woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.



Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take

thousands of rupees salary & perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice.

Thereby, they are violating the poor woman's fundamental & human rights.



Hereby, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH urges the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka ,

honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women & honourable

chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action & to speedily provide justice to this poor

woman.


PROBLEM FACING BY VILLAGERS REGARDING TO HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED, RAMPURA-AGUNCHA MINES.




To

The Prime Minister

INDIA

Sub:- Problem regarding to give employment for the LAND LOSERS of Hindustan Zinc Limited Rampura Aguncha (Bhilwara)

Rajasthan.

Respected Sir,

We want to draw your kind attention on a sensitive matter, which is following.

The government of India started a process of acquiring land for Hindustan Zinc Limited Rampura Aguncha (Bhilwara)

Rajasthan 20 years ago in 1986-87. Hon. Sh.M.L.Fotedar former union mines minister of India, Hon. Sh. Shiv Charan Mathur

former chief minister of Rajasthan and Hon. Sh. Girdhari Lal Vyas former M.P Bhilwara came to Aguncha to inaugurate HZL

Rampura Aguncha.

All the guests appealed to farmers of Aguncha village for cooperation in land acquiring process in national interest. They

assured the villagers in public meeting to give job for one member of a family for land losers in HZL. (Proof letter no 3196

Hon. Sh. Shiv Charan Mathur former M.P of Bhilwara, Rajasthan)

It is a sad fact that since then Appx. 180 land losers(List attached)who looses their means of living do not get any job in HZL.

The villagers gave their lands without any difficulty in national interest. We gave help to flourish this company and still we are

facing many problems like environment, pollution(Bherukhera), shortage of drinking and irrigation water, disorder in education

system, relocation of masses(Rampura)etc.from HZL. (Proof letter no spl 64 gram panchayat Aguncha)

We want to say that many irregularities occurred in giving jobs in HZL. Land losers and local villagers were deprived from jobs.

We are waiting for jobs and justice.

We formed “ Rampura Aguncha Khan Prabhavit Kisan Sangh ’’ in 1993 to draw attention of authorities for our problems. We

appealed so many times to HZL authority and government to solve our problem.

We held a meeting regarding this problem with Hon. Sh. Balram Singh Yadev former union mines minister of India, Hon. Sh.

Shiv Charan Mathur former M.P of Bhilwara, Rajasthan and Sh. A.C.Vadhavan former C.M.D. HZL on 31st March 1994. In this

meeting Mr. Vadhavan assured all of them and us to give jobs immediately but he did not formulated this decision. (the letter

no 2118/94 of Hon. Sh. Shiv Charan Mathur former M.P of Bhilwara, Rajasthan )

When Hon. Sh. Shiv Charan Mathur recalled him about the progress, Mr. Vadhavan said “ However Rampura aguncha Mines

are under expansion and we shall consider the cases of land losers at the appropriate time subject to vacancies and

depending upon their suitability to the vacant posts as assured before the Honorable State Minister of Mines.’’(Proof letter

no 9772/Aug. 94/HZL Head Office Udaipur)

But since then nearly 180 land losers are waiting for their jobs.

There is an arrangement in Indian Constitution that if government acquire land from farmers for PSU the jobs will be given to

each land holders and if PSU is not able to give job, an unemployment compensation will be given, till the land losers does

not get jobs. This rule is followed in coal mines in Bihar, Orrisa and W.B. which are also PSUs. A cash compensation was

given to each land losers monthly till the PSU did not give job to land losers. This regulation is not followed by HZL. (It refers

in the letter no 2256/94 of Hon. Sh. Shiv Charan Mathur former M.P of Bhilwara, Rajasthan)

It is a very great problem of us which is affecting our whole system of life. Any person who raised his voice against this

problem, he was suppress by hook and crook.

Our humble request is that please takes keen interest in our great problem and give justice to us.


Please give copy to us of your kind support.


Our all problems are in this web link Please rectify our genuine problems. A big thanks for support us.

http://problemhzl.blogspot.com


PUBLIC CROSS-EXAMINATION OF HONOURABLE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE , MYSORE , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA &

COMMISSIONER MCC MYSORE


1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modified the mysore city's comprehensive city development plan

?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision
/ modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say
from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed
by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality ,
if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?

6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting
market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ?

if not why ?

7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been
built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking
space , no

emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT ?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered
by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action

status report yearwise ?

9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites ,
buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers

since 1987 ?

10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against
each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report

yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just
through

MUDA's / MCC's resolution instead of of reallotting the same through
public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list ,
after giving

notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so
why ?

12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in
reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ?
what is

the procedure followed ?

13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate
developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies ,

real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC ,
GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against
such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why

?

15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real
estate firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA norms ,

layout plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road ,
space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping

high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is
in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw

violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally
neglected by MUDA /

MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries /
accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire
exit , when

people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the
complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going

that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents ,
injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for

those accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of
turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons ,

judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports
persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA
/ MCC /

GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies
, who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority
people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building

temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes
down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies

of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands
worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of

rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by
levying a

pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise

figures ?

22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are
under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES
recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals –
tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient
time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?

26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?

27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands ,
for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?

28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from
farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real
estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage
of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands
belonging to

village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to
village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers.
All the

villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay

compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have
been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA

MCC or other land developers ?

31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes ,
ponds ? how many are created till date ?

32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in
busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent
structures

should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In
some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities
have

developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending
lakhs of

taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service
personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these
structures under

& surrounding HT lines legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures

yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?

34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &
private developers , the sewage water generated in those
areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by
MUDA , MCC & other developers , housing societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts
developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are
dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into
unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment &

creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring
sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore
city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ?

action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .

38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands ,
agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for
non agricultural

purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ?
some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private
industries ,

multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to

industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of
agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial

area development plan ?

40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice
calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's /
MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations how

many ?

42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
private companies ? on what legal grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate
mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has
been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking
, lake in front

of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all
these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why

? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL
JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after
purchase of

lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can
participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that ,
said land is open for alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections
, in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks ,

employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge
profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?

48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are
allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they
will use it

for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the
whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the
stated public

/ social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or
government in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since
1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action

taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized
by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987
till

date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public
objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC /
REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land acquisition

/ denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial
lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said

trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT
before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?

55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the
sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?


PUBLIC CROSS-EXAMINATION OF HONOURABLE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE , BANGALORE , COMMISSIONER OF

BBMNP , COMMISSIONER OF BDA & CHAIRMAN OF KIADB


1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city's

comprehensive city development plan ?

2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are

followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic

amenities ?

6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic

amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?

7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no

parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987

? what is the action status report yearwise ?

9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by

criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?

10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not

why ? provide status report yearwise ?

11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such

illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same

through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original

allottee ? if not done so why ?

12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to

the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?

13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many

housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how

many not ? since 1987 till date ?

14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal

real estate firms ? if not why ?

15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have

violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency

fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of

levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those violations.

Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people

die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on

pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that

way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?

17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses

to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments

by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?

19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT norms ?

20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down

those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP /

KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA

/ BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal

occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?

21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987

till date ? yearwise figures ?

22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report

yearwise since 1987 ?

23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned

by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction

schedules ?

26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?

27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the

project plan ?

28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by

way making profits just like a real estate agency ?

29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village ,

lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the

benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?

30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites ,

etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?

31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are

created till date ?

32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no

permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in

the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement

spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement

of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?

33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other

developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?

34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private

developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?

35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other

developers , housing societies ?

36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies

are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus

disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring

sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .

37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .

38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers

for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents

have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?


39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's

comprehensive industrial area development plan ?

40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation

of such lands ?

41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's industrial area

development plan ? violations how many ?

42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to

suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?

43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in

mysore ?

44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is

shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in

conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?

45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders

that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the

government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation

legal ?

48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the

reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for

commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP /

KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?

49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP /

KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal

grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?

51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?

52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials & their family

members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?

53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on

lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period ,

without public auction ?

55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before

the expiry of lease period ?

56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no:

310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.

57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?

58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?

59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?

60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?

61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of

allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said

house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of

BDA committee. Is it legal ?

62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost .

is it legal ?

63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF

BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.

CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A) AGAINST A POOR WOWAN


The B.D.A flouts it's own rules & spreads red carpet for big land developers & land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money

spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements & rowdies. They illegally

evict genuine allottees who are poor & without any connections from allotted prime lands & sell-off those prime land to the

highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas & in some cases left in the lurch.



Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house

no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.

310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.



The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah

complied with all the rules & in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A'S account. However when

he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He

complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn't take steps to evict the illegal

encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf

ears. Hurt by this gross injustice & mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.



Subsequently, the poor man's daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once

again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father's allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different

game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house & told her that they will

regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans & repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before

she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor

woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.



Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take

thousands of rupees salary & perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice.

Thereby, they are violating the poor woman's fundamental & human rights.



Hereby, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH urges the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka ,

honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women & honourable

chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action & to speedily provide justice to this poor

woman.














Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS ,

LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE ………. 570017 INDIA……………………cell :09341820313
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw, http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ ,http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ ,

http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com,
contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

HUMAN RIGHT APPEALS

e –Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom



Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....vol.4…issue.24......14/06/2008



Support Amnesty International


editorial : AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA - Investigate mass graves in Kashmir and Jammu



Dear Prime Minister
I am writing to urge that the Government of India conduct urgent investigations into hundreds of unidentified graves discovered since 2006 in Jammu and Kashmir. These investigations must be independent, impartial and follow international standards.
The grave sites are believed to contain the remains of victims of unlawful killings, enforced disappearances, torture and other abuses which occurred in the context of armed conflict persisting in the state since 1989. The graves of at least 940 persons have reportedly been found in 18 villages in Uri district alone.
Unlawful killings, enforced disappearances and torture are violations of both international human rights law and international humanitarian law, set out in treaties to which India is a state party and in customary international law. They also constitute international crimes.
I therefore urge you to:
• ensure that prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigations into all sites of mass graves in Jammu and Kashmir are immediately carried out by forensic experts in line with UN Model Protocol on the disinterment and analysis of skeletal remains; make available adequate resources; and seek and accept offers of assistance and cooperation from international experts, both in carrying out the work itself, and in training local personnel engaged in the work. As an immediate step, the grave sites must be secured in order to preserve the evidence;
• ensure that all past and current allegations of enforced disappearances are promptly, thoroughly, independently and impartially investigated and that, where there is sufficient evidence, anyone suspected of responsibility for such crimes is prosecuted in proceedings which meet international fair trial standards;
• ensure that all victims of unlawful killings, enforced disappearance and torture are granted full reparations, including restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition.



Jai hind. Vande mataram.



Your's sincerely,

Nagaraj.M.R.


AN APPEAL ALL HONOURABLE MEMBERS OF U.S SENATE & U.S CONGRESS , GOVERNMENT OF USA


Respect the Supreme Court, Respect Justice

Dear sir / madam ,

I hope you join me in welcoming the Supreme Court’s decision that detainees held by the U.S. government at Guantánamo have the right to habeas corpus—the fundamental right to challenge the legality of their detention. This is the third time since 2004 that the Supreme Court has rejected the Bush administration’s arguments that it can indefinitely detain people without charge or meaningful hearing.

Regrettably, the last time the Supreme Court ruled that detainees have the right to habeas corpus, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act in an effort to strip that right away.

I urge you to respect the Supreme Court’s ruling that detainees at Guantánamo have the right to habeas corpus. I also recommend that you stand against any new legislation attempting to strip habeas corpus or replace it with an inadequate substitute.

The Supreme Court’s decision is limited. It will not close Guantánamo. Nor will it guarantee detainees a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal; the military commissions regime remains in place. I therefore urge you to introduce or support legislation requiring all detainees held by the U.S. at Guantánamo and elsewhere to either be charged with recognizably criminal offenses and provided fair trials before an independent and impartial tribunal, such as a U.S. federal court, or be released immediately and unconditionally.

Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.


AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF WEST BENGAL INDIA

Dear Sir,

INDIA: The circumstances in which a serach was conducted at MASUM's office in West Bengal must be investigated

Names of the victim: Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), 26, Guitendal Lane, Howrah-711101, West Bengal, India
Names of the alleged perpetrators:
1. West Bengal state government
2. Mr. Prabir Chatterge, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Detective Department, West Bengal state police, Kolkata, West Bengal
Date of incident: 12 June 2008
Place of incident: Guitendal Lane, Howrah, West Bengal

I am informed by the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) that the West Bengal State Police had conducted an arbitrary search at the MASUM’s office in West Bengal on 12 June 2008. MASUM is a human rights organisation of high reputation that is based in West Bengal, India.

I am informed that MASUM, a partner organisation of the PWTN (a Tamilnad – India based human rights group) in a national campaign against torture, held a public hearing on custodial torture on 9 and 10 June 2008 in West Bengal where about 1200 victims and their families were present and 82 victims deposed before the tribunal. The West Bengal Police tried to interrupt the proceedings which were chaired by well respected human rights activists and judges in India.

I am also informed that after the search at MASUM’s office documents and audiovisual equipments were seized by the police on grounds and reasons best known to the police. MASUM’s President Mr. Kirity Roy who was contacted by the AHRC informed that in spite of repeated requests, the MASUM was not informed why the police is searching their premise and for what purpose the documents were seized. The police have refused to divulge even the case number that relates to the search and insisted that they have a search warrant issued from a local court.

I am informed that while it is the prerogative of an investigating agency to conduct an investigation of a suspected crime, it is equally the right of an individual and an organisation in India to know under what crime they are being investigated and the reason for a search that is conducted in the premises of the organisation and what offense is registered against the organisation/individual. I am informed that that the police has refused to divulge this information to MASUM.

I am also aware that MASUM is reporting cases of police torture from West Bengal and that it is often a practice of the Indian authorities to interrupt the work of human rights organisations and activists whenever human rights work attracts international attention. It is presumed that MASUM has also fallen prey to this atrocious act by the Indian authorities.

I am further informed that it is highly probable that the police might register false charges against the MASUM and may even take into custody the staff associated with MASUM, in which case their security is at risk.

I therefore urge you to immediately intervene in this situation and ensure that the investigation of the case, if any, registered against MASUM or its staff is carried out in an independent manner. I also further urge you that the entire incident that led to a search at MASUM's office need to be separately investigated and the real purpose be brought to light, even if it exposes state or central government involvement for harassing a human rights organisation.

Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.


AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE UNION EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER , GOI , INDIA



Dear Minister,

I am very concerned to learn of a draft decision which was tabled at the Human Rights Council on 12 June 2008 (L.15) by the governments of India and the Russian Federation. If passed, this decision will result in the inclusion in the list of vacancies for appointment of Special Procedures mandate holders the thematic mandates where the mandate-holder has completed his or her first term of three years. I urge the Government of [ ] not to support this decision.

The review of the Special Procedures mandates, which began in September 2007 and continued at the current 8th session of the Council last week, has demonstrated broad support for the renewal of the vast majority of mandates. However, in the last few days, a number of states have used the opportunity of the review to criticize the performance of some mandate-holders. The Council has adopted a Code of Conduct to establish professional standards for mandate-holders. If there is misconduct in the execution of a mandate, it should be addressed using the established procedures for the application of the Code of Conduct and with due process.

The implications of the draft decision which has now been tabled will reach far beyond a single mandate, with mandate-holders becoming the focus of negotiation. This would, among other things, put the mandate-holders at risk of undue political pressure by states, pressure that can only be detrimental to their capacity to carry out their functions in an independent and impartial manner while in office. It would also act as a disincentive for mandate-holders from developing and carrying out anything but short-term plans in their respective areas of work. It would seriously undermine the capacity of mandate-holders to fulfil effectively their mandates given by the Council.

I urge the Government of [ ] to review the mandates of the Special Procedures in accordance with agreed procedures, and to take action to ensure that mandate-holders who have completed only three years of their tenure are not removed from office.

Your's Sincerely,
Nagaraj.m.r.















Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE ………. 570017 INDIA……………………cell :09341820313
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw, http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ ,http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com,
contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA

Sunday, June 8, 2008

ANTI DALIT POLICIES OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

e –Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom


Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....vol.4…issue.23......07/06/2008


Support Amnesty International


Editorial : the most backward , neglected among the backward caste people - SCAVENGERS - an appeal to honourable supreme court of india

In India, since independence certain affirmative actions by the government like job reservations , reservations in educational institutions , loan facilities , etc are extended to the backward class , oppressed people. However , the persons who have economically, socially become stronger on the basis of these government affirmative actions are not letting their own brethren - scavenging community to utilize the same. The politicians are just making noises about sub caste reservation for scheduled castes & tribes , but doing nothing. As a result , today we find some sub-castes & tribes of SC / ST better off than their previous generation, some other sub-castes & tribes of SC / ST are reeling under utter poverty , social ostracism , etc.
A human being can be in a civilized form , healthy - if we have scavengers to clean our toilets , drainages , if we have barbers to cut our hairs. The very same people who keep us healthy & civilized are not treated in a civilized manner by the society , why ? most of the town municipalities , city corporations are employing scavengers on daily wages without any statuotary benefits & are paid less than the statuotary minimum wages. every towns & cities in India are bursting with population growth , however the number of scavengers has not been increased in proportion to the growth of population , In most of the cases the existing scavengers are overburdened with the work load. , Most of them are suffering from occupational health hazards , are dying at young ages leaving their families in the lurch.
Hereby, we appeal to honourable supreme court of India to treat this as a PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION & to order government of India , all state governments , statuotary bodies like city corporations , town municiapalities , etc,
1. to regularize the jobs of all scavengers , to provide all statuotary benefits like ESI,PF, etc.
2. to take all necessary steps to eradicate manual scavenging - carrying human excreta on heads.
3. to take all necessary steps to protect their health & occupational safety.
Bottomline : all the citizens , the society must learn to respect their brethren who keeps them healthy , tidy & civilized. JAI HIND.VANDE MATARAM.
Your's sincerely, Nagaraj.M.R.


AN APPEAL TO H.E.PRESIDENT OF INDIA - TO STOP ATROCITIES AGAINST DALITS


In India , even today after 59 years of independence & democratic governance , the plight of DALITS , TRIBALS , DOWNTRODDEN & POOR has not improved . in fact it has worsened . the government & public servants just pay lip service to dalits & have totally failed to uplift them in 59 years of independence . the public servants want dalits to be as such to ride over them & to use them as pawns in power politics , as a vote bank. let them answer how many dalits have become supreme court judges in india . even today in india , the practice of carrying human excreta on head still persists . what is the use if india becomes an IT POWER or knowledge base . what is the use if india sends it's own satellites on it's own rockets ot space . did those scientific achievements has devolved , percolated to dalits & poor in the society , has it benefitted them ? NO . JUST SEE THE RECENT ATROCITIES AGAINST DALITS IN KADAKOLA , KARNATAKA & KARLINJARA , MAHARASHTRA. HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN THE PAST ATROCITIES AGAINST DALITS IN BADANAVALU & KAMBALAPALLI , KARNATAKA.
THIS IS AN APPEAL TO OUR HUMBLE , HUMANE FIRST CITIZEN H.E.PRESIDENT OF INDIA , TO HELP DALITS & POOR IN DISTRESS . JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.
YOUR'S SINCERELY, NAGARAJ.M.R.


PRACTICE OF UNTOUCHABILITY BY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDIA - VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF DALITS


In india , rich people belonging to forward castes form educational trusts , proclaiming that they want to serve the society by providing education to all irrespective of caste or creed. By this declaration they get Civic Amenity sites from government authorities at concessional rates. Further they get tax , duty exemptions on materials , machines they import for the educational institution. However , while admitting students they are purely commercial minded , the highest bidder gets the seats.
IF AT ALL THE SOLE AIM OF THESE INSTITUTIONS IS COMMERCIAL – LET THEM BE REGISTERED AS COMMERCIAL BODIES , ASK THEM TO GET SITES AT COMMERCIAL MARKET RATES , ASK THEM TO PAY TAXES ON MATERIALS , MACHINES & THEIR YEARLY INCOME. ENFORCE MINIMUM WAGES ACT , GRATUITIES ACT , P.F & ESI ACT TO THESE INSTITUTIONS WHO ARE PAYING A PITTANCE TO THEIR STAFF.
Some institutions like industrial training institutes ( I.T.I) , polytechnics , engineering colleges & medical colleges run by trusts floated by forward castes lack basic infrastructure , to teach students properly , they only appoint staff belonging to thier castes. Dalits ,minorities , weaker section people are not at all selected. They don't publicly advertise for vacancies. They fill all posts with thier own caste people & finally even get government grant in aid. How ? These institutions are getting affiliations , yearly approvals form the government , how ? actually they should have been shut. These trusts want government backing for tax exemptions , lands at concessional rates ,monetary benefits , etc , however the same trusts are not willing to implement the social welfare objectives of the government , by providing seats to weaker sections , by providing appointments to dalits few posts in all category of positions ( not just group D - dalits are also brilliant & capable of performing all jobs, they have proved it ).
Hereby , we urge honourable prime minister of india , government of india & honourable chief minister of karnataka , government of karnataka to :
1. before giving lands at concessional rate , tax exemptions , to any educational trusts the government must ensure that the trust must adhere to the social welfare norms of the government from day one.
2. Before giving affiliations to educational institutions the govt must ensure , are the institutions are providing sufficient infrastructure to students ?
3. Before giving grant in aid to any institution , the government must ensure have the management provided jobs to dalits , minorities , etc as per norms from the day one . if not grant in aid should be rejected. Here there is no meaning in giving reservation of jobs in future appointments in those institutions , as all the posts are presently filled with forward castes , there is no expansion projects. So , dalits have to wait for another 30-40 years to get the vacancies in those institutions after the retirement of forward caste employees , which is not at all practical or realistic .
4. In karnataka state , numerous Industrial Training Institutes ( ITI) have mushroomed , some don't even have basic infrastructure. Still they are running the show , how ? these ITIs run by forward caste people have appointed only their caste people to all posts , not even a single dalit is there. Still they have got government grant in aid , how ? we urge honourable chief minister of karnataka , to look into this & in future to provide grant in aid in aid to only those I.T.Is which have proper infrastructure & dalits , weaker section employees on their pay-rolls.
5. To order all educational institutions to make public announcement of vacancies in their institutions even though not covered under grant in aid , as they have already taken sufficient monetary benefits from the government.
6. To order all educational institutions , to admit students as per government rates of fees. Some institutions are fleecing higher fees from the students , but are giving receipts for lesser amount only.
7. If any educational institutions don't agree with the government norms , those institutions must be asked to be registered as commercial bodies , no tax exemptions , lands at concessional rates , allotment of CA sites should be given to them by the government.
By these measures alone poor & weaker section people will get justice . you are aware of merited but poor students committing suicides year after year , CET fiasco - due to their financial inability to join medical or engineering colleges. Numerous similar cases are there with regard to admission to ITIs . polytechnics. The greed & casteism of these educational institutions is reigning high. In the positive hope that you will be kind enough to put an end to this menace. Jai hind. Vande mataram. Thanking you.
Your's sincerely, Nagaraj.M.R.


UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS


On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

PREAMBLE
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6.
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8.
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 9.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11.
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 15.
(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Article 16.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
Article 17.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
Article 22.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Article 23.
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
Article 24.
Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
Article 26.
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.
Article 27.
(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.
Article 28.
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29.
(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.







Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE ………. 570017 INDIA……………………cell :09341820313home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw, http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/,http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ ,http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com,contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA

Monday, June 2, 2008

HEY APOLOGIZE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

e –Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom

Editor: Nagaraj.M.R....vol.4…issue.22......31/05/2008

Support Amnesty International

Editorial : INDIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS MUST LEARN TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS

In India , law is observed more in breach than enforcement by the public servants , rich & mighty. Hereby , we do hope atleast from now onwards our governments , authorities & our public servants will learn to respect law , will learn to respect human beings. Jai hind. Vande mataram.

Your's sincerely,

Nagaraj.m.r.

Sixty years of human rights failure – governments must apologize and act now

Amnesty International today challenged world leaders to apologize for six decades of human rights failure and re-commit themselves to deliver concrete improvements.

"The human rights flashpoints in Darfur, Zimbabwe, Gaza, Iraq and Myanmar demand immediate action," said Irene Khan, Secretary General of Amnesty International, launching AI Report 2008: State of the World's Human Rights.

"Injustice, inequality and impunity are the hallmarks of our world today. Governments must act now to close the yawning gap between promise and performance."

Amnesty International's Report 2008, shows that sixty years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations, people are still tortured or ill-treated in at least 81 countries, face unfair trials in at least 54 countries and are not allowed to speak freely in at least 77 countries.

"2007 was characterised by the impotence of Western governments and the ambivalence or reluctance of emerging powers to tackle some of the world's worst human rights crises, ranging from entrenched conflicts to growing inequalities which are leaving millions of people behind," said Ms Khan.

Amnesty International cautioned that the biggest threat to the future of human rights is the absence of a shared vision and collective leadership.

"2008 presents an unprecedented opportunity for new leaders coming to power and countries emerging on the world stage to set a new direction and reject the myopic policies and practices that in recent years have made the world a more dangerous and divided place," said Ms Khan.

Amnesty International challenged governments to set a new paradigm for collective leadership based on the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

"The most powerful must lead by example," said Ms Khan.

  • China must live up to the human rights promises it made around the Olympic Games and allow free speech and freedom of the press and end "re-education through labour".
  • The USA must close Guantánamo detention camp and secret detention centres, prosecute the detainees under fair trial standards or release them, and unequivocally reject the use of torture and ill-treatment.
  • Russia must show greater tolerance for political dissent, and none for impunity on human rights abuses in Chechnya.
  • The EU must investigate the complicity of its member states in "renditions" of terrorist suspects and set the same bar on human rights for its own members as it does for other countries.

Ms Khan warned: "World leaders are in a state of denial but their failure to act has a high cost. As Iraq and Afghanistan show, human rights problems are not isolated tragedies, but are like viruses that can infect and spread rapidly, endangering all of us."

"Governments today must show the same degree of vision, courage and commitment that led the United Nations to adopt the Universal Declaration of Human Rights sixty years ago."

"There is a growing demand from people for justice, freedom and equality."

Some of the most striking images of 2007 were of monks in Myanmar, lawyers in Pakistan, and women activists in Iran.

"Restless and angry, people will not be silenced, and leaders ignore them at their own peril," said Ms Khan.

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

AN APPEAL TO Chan Heng Chee - Ambassador (Singapore) & Krit Garnjana-Goonchorn - Amb. Extraordinary & Plenipotentiary (Thailand)
Dear sir ,

Sub : Provide Aid to the Victims of Cyclone Nargis

I am writing about the humanitarian and human rights crisis unfolding in Myanmar since Cyclone Nargis caused tens of thousands of deaths and devastated the Irrawaddy (Ayeyawady) Delta region. Up to 2.5 million people have been severely affected and made homeless without essential food, shelter or healthcare. It is now more than two weeks since the cyclone, but still the survivors and victims are not receiving the necessary relief, and it is feared that thousands more will die because of malnutrition, communicable diseases and exposure to the elements.

I welcome that ASEAN has formed an Emergency Rapid Assessment Team in response, and I am asking that ASEAN and the member states of ASEAN, collectively and individually, redouble efforts to use their influence and do their utmost to pressure and encourage the government of Myanmar to immediately end all obstructions placed in the way of international expert aid and assistance. A massive international relief effort is needed to get aid to those who are suffering hour by hour, to allow UN and NGO experts immediate unhindered access to the affected areas, in assisting the Myanmar authorities in protecting their people, and preventing this humanitarian and human rights crisis from deteriorating further. By deliberately blocking life-sustaining aid, the government of Myanmar may be violating the right of its population to life, and to adequate food and healthcare. I am also very concerned about reports of discriminatory practices in distribution of humanitarian assistance against the Karen ethnic group, who constitute a significant proportion of the Irrawaddy delta population. Please urge the government of Myanmar to provide humanitarian aid throughout the affected areas without discrimination or political considerations.

Some of the possible wider implications of this humanitarian and human rights crisis in Myanmar include rice shortages and massive displacement within the Southeast Asia region, which should be the concern of all ASEAN member states.

In signing the ASEAN Charter, all ASEAN member states undertook to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms.

I hope you will give urgent consideration to these concerns.

Your's sincerely,

Nagaraj.m.r.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE ………. 570017 INDIA……………………cell :09341820313
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw, http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ ,
http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ ,http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ , http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com,
contact :
naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA